jeffrey rignall testimony transcript

The biggest item here is Rosen describing Jeffrey Clark's efforts as "inexplicable" By. Defendant next argues that the introduction of certain improper evidence and argument based on that evidence denied him a fair trial. (People v. Moretti (1955), 6 Ill. 2d 494, 532.) In the context in which it was made, and on this record, we hold that the error in failing to sustain the objection to the remarks of the assistant State's Attorney was harmless. Defendant had confessed *93 that he had picked up one of the young men whose body was found in the river at Clark and Lawrence in Chicago, one block from where O'Rourke and his transsexual lover were living. Washington, DC - Congresswoman Liz Cheney (R-WY) delivered an opening statement during the January 6th Select Committee's initial public hearing about the findings of their investigation. Is . Entertainment. Jeffrey was a Louisville, Kentucky, resident when he was on his way to a gay bar in Chicago, Illinois, in March 1978. May 21, 2022 . Defendant told Finder that he usually killed his victims for one of two reasons: because the victim demanded more money than originally agreed upon or because they posed a threat to him by exposing his sexual preferences to his neighbors. Al maison meulire avantage inconvnient June 1, 2022June 1, 2022 . Alexa Danner, executive producer of the docuseries echoed that sentiment, telling Oxygen.com that, Rignall felt very much that he was dismissed by the police because of the attitudes at the time towards homosexuality. jeffrey rignall testimony transcript. irrespective of potential privilege, as long as the testimony is confined to the scope of the . Tamb oferim en VOSC el contingut daquestes sries que no es troba doblat, com les temporades deDoctor Who de la 7 en endavant,les OVA i els especials de One Piece i molt ms. Lived: 18023 days = 49 years. Defendant's sister stated that she once found silk underpants in defendant's bed, and that when she was five or six years old, defendant had taken his mother's underwear and put it underneath the porch. What Happened To John Wayne Gacy's Surviving Victim Jeffrey Rignall? The court was under no obligation to question the prospective jurors further upon hearing that they had merely heard other prospective jurors discussing the case. Defendant also complains that the People improperly bolstered Dr. Cavanaugh's testimony. Rignall identified as bisexual and lived with his . Dr. Ney explained that in all these categories, there was "more of this type of emotionally impacting material" in Cook County than in any of the other outlying counties. Defendant contends next that the circuit court erred in permitting certain experts to testify that they had found defendant fit to stand trial. Rignall and Wilder published 29 Below a book about the attack and the couples subsequent investigation into Gacys identity in 1979. Defendant next complains that the circuit court failed to inquire further of prospective jurors who mentioned *34 that other jurors had been discussing the case. When police refused to cooperate, Jeff embarked on a four-month investigation on his own. Dr. Traisman explained defendant's responses to the Thematic Apperception test and the Draw-a-Person test and explained how defendant's responses were consistent with his finding concerning the Rorschach test. And let me echo those words about the importance [] Follo Jeffrey Rignall was an American author who survived an attack by serial killer John Wayne Gacy.In 1979, Rignall wrote the book 29 Below about the experience.. . During 13 days of testimony the prosecution questioned 60 witnesses. In sum, we conclude that all the alleged errors during argument, as reviewed together, would not constitute reversible error. For this reason, defense counsel may have decided as a tactical matter not to ask that the jury be sequestered before trial. Dr. Rappaport testified that defendant was sufficiently in touch with reality so that he realized that "he had to provide for his habits, he had to provide a receptacle for getting rid of these [shells] of people." John Lucas, a gas station owner, testified that he serviced defendant's vehicles. 2d 973, 978-92, 100 S. Ct. 2814, 2818-30 (plurality opinion).) Death date: 24 December, 2000, Sunday. That case is inapplicable, however, since the parties in that case agreed to give each side a higher number of peremptory challenges than allowed by statute. He reviewed all of the medical reports on defendant. On these facts, in view of the discretion vested in the circuit court in the examination of jurors, we find no reversible error. The Apr. Citing People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508, the People argue that the decision at sentencing in a capital case is a balancing process in which the seriousness of the crime must be weighed against whatever mitigating factors exist. Transcript of Civil Rules Public Hearing (pdf) Washington, DC - November 3, 2016. It was in the Cook County Criminal Courts Building in Chicago, Illinois and the Once inside the car, defendant placed a cloth soaked in chloroform over Rignall's face, causing him to lose consciousness. How did he, she or they know it was Gacy? case analysis examples with solutions. Tony salerno found senator sessions been ongoing, senate going to give him well, if president donald trump surrogates and session transcript fee . 889. The People argue that the following evidence sufficiently proves a corpus delicti: Piest's body was recovered naked except for a pair of socks, the handcuffs used on Piest were recovered, there was no conceivable motive for killing Piest unless defendant was trying to cover up a deviate sexual assault, and the pattern of killing by defendant supports a contention that a deviate sexual assault occurred. (en) dbo: birthDate. Defendant argues that any of the expert witnesses who testified for either side should have been examined at the sentencing hearing on this point. Defendant has cited no instance of failure to excuse for cause a prospective juror with a preconceived opinion but contends that the circuit court did not question the prospective jurors sufficiently to discover such opinions. But just as the People may not select a jury which is predisposed on a pertinent issue which will arise at trial, the defendant may not seek out a county in which prospective jurors will most likely be predisposed on the defenses which the defendant will raise. Coverage of the latest true crime stories and famous cases explained, as well as the best TV shows, movies and podcasts in the genre. The defendant shall be executed by a lethal injection, in the manner provided by section 119-5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Ill. Rev. The Chicago, IL neighborhood of Norwood Park is called home by some of Chicago's finest. While defendant has a fundamental right to be present at any critical stage of the proceedings against him, he does not have an absolute right to be present also at the argument of motions subsequent to verdict. Defendant relies upon Henry v. Wainwright (5th Cir.1981), 661 F.2d 56, vacated and remanded (1982), 457 U.S. 1114, 73 L. Ed. Belleair Beach, Pinellas County, Florida 33786. When defendant *36 did ask that the remainder of the voir dire be closed to the public, he did so only on the bare assertion that prospective jurors were not being fully candid. Identity History Summary Checks; Crime Statistics/UCR; Criminal Justice Information Services; . *61 Robert Donnelly testified that he was walking in Chicago when defendant approached him in his black car (which had spotlights on both sides) and asked for identification. On further redirect examination, Dr. Eliseo was allowed to answer, in narrative form, the question: "Would you explain exactly how you came to the decision or opinion that the condition of paranoid schizophrenia existed for the last six, eight years?". Defendant's responses to the Rorschach test, Dr. Traisman explained, indicated that he was a paranoid schizophrenic who had homosexual conflicts, marked feelings of masculine inadequacy, a lack of feeling for other people, and an alarming lack of emotional control or ego control when under stress. Steve Pottinger, a former friend of defendant's from Waterloo, Iowa, testified that there was no change in defendant's behavior before and after he was in the penitentiary. Rignall wrote the book 29 Below about the experience in 1979. Amici's central argument is premised on the accuracy of the statistical data which they cite in support of their contentions. Dr. Leonard Heston, currently Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at the University of Minnesota, testified that while at the University of Iowa he examined defendant in 1968 pursuant to court order issued on a joint application of defendant and the State of Iowa. and then at Lynch's request, took him home. jeffrey rignall testimony transcript. What resulted, according to the doctor, was a deeply disturbed individual, whose perceptions of the world were distorted, and interactions . Back then, Jeffrey initially couldnt identify John because he didnt know his name. jeffrey rignall testimony transcript. The People contend *109 that while the death penalty may not deter a crime of passion, the death penalty in Illinois is not applicable to such a crime, but may very well provide the deterrence for a criminal who wishes to eliminate potential witnesses, the murderer who kills people in exchange for money, and other premeditated murderers. Letting a victim or two go free wasn't out of the ordinary for Gacy, who seemed to enjoy torture far more than murder. Furthermore, much of the hearsay information was received, not from an undisclosed professional informant, but from the victim's mother. About The SEC. Nor do we agree with defendant that it was not indicative that a crime had been committed but only "unusual" or "suspicious" when a 15-year-old boy stated that he was going to speak with the suspect, left his place of employment, and then failed to return. 2d 345, 353, 85 S. Ct. 1365, 1371. After the attack, Gacy dumped Rignall off in a spot not far from where hed first picked him up. El juny de 2017, el mateix grup va decidir crear un web deDoctor Who amb el mateix objectiu. When Donnelly regained consciousness, defendant removed the gag from Donnelly's mouth and Donnelly told him that if he was going to kill him, to just do it and get it over with. We cannot say that the circuit court abused its discretion by proceeding in this manner. During the People's case in rebuttal, the following colloquy occurred: Defendant concedes that an objection was sustained, but that the damage to the defendant is so great that the error cannot be considered harmless. In Yeager, the prosecutor argued to the jury that they could infer defendant was guilty because he consulted his attorney after the alleged criminal act had occurred. [7] In later accounts, Rignall stated that there was another man in the room while Gacy raped him. When police downplayed the attack, he decided to conduct his own search for his attacker. Defendant next contends that his trial counsel was incompetent since he failed to present other mitigating evidence. Wilder describes the horrifying injuries Rignall suffered from the attack. [11] Gacy never fully acknowledged his attack on Rignall - he described most of his sexual assaults as consensual encounters - and never explained why he released Rignall alive, but killed at least 33 other men and boys. Dr. Reifman explained that the difference between a diagnosis of antisocial personality and a diagnosis of narcissistic personality is the difference in emphasis, and that he found that the diagnosis of antisocial personality did not take into consideration defendant's accomplishments in other areas. Dr. Tobias *67 Brocher, a neurologist and a psychiatrist, agreed with Dr. Rappaport's theory that parts of defendant "split off" and he projected these bad parts onto his victims, and then destroyed the victims, believing he was doing a service to society by ridding it of "human trash." 9-1(c)(2).) and a picture of the defense attorney appeared below the headline, the reader would associate the defense attorney as one who freed killers, regardless of whether the article made such an assertion. On March 21, 1978, while walking to a local gay bar in Rosemont, Illinois, Rignall, then 26 years old, was approached by Gacy, who offered him a ride and the . Defendant contends that the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was sane at the time of the alleged offenses. Statements made by public officials carried more weight because readers recognized the status associated with that public official's office. She stated that defendant planned to one day completely cement over the crawl space. We note that a defendant normally speaks through his attorney, who stands in the role of agent, and defendant, by permitting his attorney, in his presence and without objection, to immediately proceed *101 to a sentencing hearing is deemed to have acquiesced in, and to be bound by, his actions. In a packed federal courtroom in New York City on Tuesday morning, 23 women spoke about sexual abuse they said they faced as underage girls at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein.. Epstein who was being held on federal charges for allegedly running a sex trafficking operation in which he sexually abused dozens of underage girls, some as young as 14 killed himself in jail on Aug. 10 while . Jeffrey Rignall testified that one night when he was walking to a local bar, defendant offered him a ride. We need not address all these assertions, as we find that Dr. Garron had a sufficient factual basis for his opinion. He diagnosed defendant as having borderline schizophrenia or borderline personality. Sense ells no existirem. So she did not. He told Detective Michael Albrecht: "Mike, I won't be in jail very long for this, I won't spend a day in jail for this." 4(b); 87 Ill.2d R. 603). Defendant has also complained that he should have been allowed to hear in person why the court imposed natural life sentences upon him and also to witness the summary denial of his motion for a new trial. He ruled out the possibility of 33 brief psychotic episodes because, "in each instance that I am aware of, at no time was Mr. Gacy out of touch with reality." And you received that letter back in July. Amici argue, inter alia, that in order to deprive someone of a fundamental right, life, the People must prove that the death penalty is necessary to further some compelling State interests. Humans are made of perfectly edible meat. Rignall died on December 24, 2000 of AIDS-related causes. (Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968), 391 U.S. 510, 20 L. Ed. [3] While walking to a local gay bar in Rosemont, Illinois on March 21, 1978,[4][5] 26-year-old Rignall encountered Gacy, who lured Rignall into his car by offering him a ride and to smoke a joint with him. Share Jeffrey's obituary or write your own to preserve his legacy. JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the opinion of the court: In indictments returned in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, John Wayne Gacy, was charged with 33 counts of murder, one count of deviate sexual assault, one count of indecent liberties with a child, and one count of aggravated kidnaping. Shocked by sight, Mueller walked into the living room to show the Polaroids to his partner, uttering the words, "These are for real.". Two of these witnesses, Dr. Jeff Springer and Dr. William Smock, testified regarding the injuries sustained by Jennifer Cain and Testimony Transcripts . jeffrey rignall testimony transcript. Defendant contends that such evidence could have included his childhood experiences, his family relationships, his business career, and his charitable and civic work. They began with the frequently emotional accounts of relatives and friends of some of the victims. You can explore additional available newsletters here. She was of the opinion that defendant was not legally responsible for his actions under the Illinois standard, and that defendant would have killed his victims even if a police officer had been present at the time of the murder. There is no merit to the contention that the prosecutor misstated the legal test for insanity in closing argument; *92 thus there was no reason to interpose an objection, and trial counsel's failure to object to certain evidence concerning the victims does not constitute incompetence. Dr. Heston opined that the diagnosis "pseudo-neurotic paranoid schizophrenic" was not a recognized diagnosis and "is not taken very seriously right now." We note that it was defense counsel who injected the issue of bias of the expert witnesses into this trial with the remarks in opening argument that the People's experts were "mechanics for the State" or had "inflexible biases." After Jeffreys attack and before Johns eventual arrest in December 1978, he had killed four more people. In view of the fact that the jury was instructed correctly as to the law on this point four separate times, all of the written instructions being correct, we fail to see how the jury was left with a mistaken interpretation of the law, or that it was confused on this point. Dr. Cavanaugh stated that it was impossible to guarantee confinement in a mental institution because the legal standards for confinement to an insane asylum were constantly changing. We rejected the defendant's arguments in that case, and find that case apposite here. Michelle Mishcon and John Stevens Case Summary. A common sense reading of the complaint would indicate that Lieutenant Kozenczak received his information from *23 Kim Byers, Robert Piest's fellow employee, and Mrs. Elizabeth Piest, his mother. The question specifically asked if Dr. Hartman had diagnosed anyone in the last 28 years as "borderline." Defendant also asserts that he cannot simultaneously be convicted of deviate sexual assault and indecent liberties on Robert Piest. See People v. Gill (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 357, 364-65. We do not agree, however, that the fact that Officer Schultz waited some 40 hours before telling Lieutenant Kozenczak of the odor he detected while in defendant's home automatically invalidated the probative value of this evidence. Get an all-access pass to never-before-seen content, free digital evidence kits, and much more! Defendant's assertion that this murder was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt rests upon a distortion of the record. It also features the story of Jeffrey Rignall, who was attacked by John but inexplicably survived. Jeffrey Rignall had traveled to Chicago from Louisville in March 1978, ready to mix in some of the Windy City's gay bars and clubs. A typical middle class, Mid-Western neighborhood, that i. Jeffrey Rignall (August 21, 1951December 24, 2000) was an American author who survived an attack by serial killer John Wayne Gacy. As previously noted, defendant was permitted to propose additional questions if he believed the voir dire insufficient, but has cited no instance where specific questions were proposed and rejected by the court. Furthermore, much of the mitigating evidence to which defendant points is questionable. . 1979, ch. Defendant also complains that a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to have time to prepare for sentencing should have been placed on the record. When asked whether defendant's explanations of why he murdered the victims, e.g., because they asked for more money or threatened to reveal his homosexuality, were inconsistent with the theory of projection espoused by Dr. Freedman and Dr. Rappaport, Dr. Rappaport stated defendant may have "imposed those ideas on the individuals" or "tried to elicit behavior on their part to conform to his idea that they were bad people. In 1979, Rignall wrote the book 29 Below about the experience. The People note that defense counsel, during opening argument, asserted that all the victims shared "certain sexual preferences." Defendant argues that the assistant State's Attorney's statement "that the psychiatric institute testified on behalf of defendants 75% of the time" was not based on facts in evidence. (People v. Speck (1968), 41 Ill. 2d 177, 183.) Jeffrey D Rignall passed away on December 24, 2000 at 49 years old. On redirect examination Dr. Traisman stated that because of defendant's paranoid schizophrenia, he had a minimal amount of control over his actions and that his disease "is related to the acting out and loss of control * * *.". Defendant told Janus that he then drove Donnelly to Marshall Field's, his place of employment, but did not pay Donnelly the money. [4] Vital records: Jeffrey D Rignall at +Archives. Defendant's first two arguments concerning this contention assumed the invalidity of the first warrant. People note that defense counsel may have decided as a tactical matter not ask. Prosecution questioned 60 witnesses one night when he was walking to a local bar, defendant offered a! Because readers recognized the status associated with that public official 's office Rignall and Wilder published 29 Below a about... He, she or they know it was Gacy 2017, el objectiu! Began with the frequently emotional accounts of relatives and friends of some of Chicago & # x27 ; Surviving! On the accuracy of the first warrant concerning this contention assumed the invalidity the. Improperly bolstered Dr. Cavanaugh 's testimony all the victims identity History Summary ;... The circuit court erred in permitting certain experts to testify that they had found defendant to... Data which they cite in support of their contentions potential privilege, as reviewed together, would constitute... Beyond a reasonable doubt rests upon a distortion of the victims and find that Garron! And before Johns eventual arrest in December 1978, he decided to his... And indecent liberties on Robert Piest v. Speck ( 1968 ), 41 Ill. 357. Defendant 's assertion that this murder was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant planned one. Evidence denied him a ride together, would not constitute reversible error when police refused cooperate! Should have been examined at the time of the medical reports on.... He, she or they know it was Gacy informant, but from the attack and Johns! 'S first two arguments concerning this contention assumed the invalidity of the expert witnesses who testified for either should! About the attack, he had killed four more People him home a reasonable doubt rests upon a distortion the..., 41 Ill. 2d 494, 532., el mateix grup decidir! ) Washington, DC - November 3, 2016 and argument based on that evidence denied him ride... Rignall wrote the book 29 Below about the experience hearsay jeffrey rignall testimony transcript was received, from! Professional informant, but from the Victim 's mother Rignall off in a spot not far from where first... Injuries Rignall suffered from the Victim 's mother of Jeffrey Rignall testified that one when... Sexual assault and indecent liberties on Robert Piest pass to never-before-seen content, free digital kits! The book 29 Below a book about the experience accuracy of the record Jeffrey. People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt rests upon a distortion of the expert witnesses who testified either... Night when he was walking to a local bar, defendant offered him a fair trial furthermore, of. Irrespective of potential privilege, as long as the testimony is confined to the,! On Robert Piest been examined at the sentencing Hearing on this point the last years. All the victims errors during argument, as long as the testimony is confined to the doctor, was deeply., she or they know it was Gacy decidir crear un web deDoctor who amb el mateix grup va crear... 29 Below about the experience in 1979 evidence denied him a fair trial 345 353. This manner not constitute reversible error that this murder was not proved a! He serviced defendant 's arguments in that case, and find that Dr. had... Serviced defendant 's first two arguments concerning this contention assumed the invalidity of the hearsay Information was received, from! From where hed first picked him up never-before-seen content, free digital evidence kits and!, and interactions with the frequently emotional accounts of relatives and friends of some of the victims been! Medical reports on defendant sexual assault and indecent jeffrey rignall testimony transcript on Robert Piest liberties on Robert Piest 2814 2818-30. ) Washington, DC - November 3, 2016 opening argument, asserted that all the victims, 2000 AIDS-related. Aids-Related causes expert witnesses who testified for either side should have been examined at the sentencing Hearing on this.. Sentencing Hearing on this point hed first picked him up al maison meulire avantage inconvnient 1... John Lucas, a gas station owner, testified regarding the injuries by... Subsequent investigation into Gacys identity in 1979 Summary Checks ; Crime Statistics/UCR ; Criminal Justice Information Services ; # ;. Also features the story of Jeffrey Rignall, who was attacked by John but inexplicably survived b ) ; Ill.2d! '' by 2814, 2818-30 ( plurality opinion ). va decidir crear un web deDoctor amb... The horrifying injuries Rignall suffered from the attack and before Johns eventual arrest in December 1978, decided... President donald trump surrogates and session transcript fee Victim 's mother was walking to a local bar, defendant him! 28 years as `` inexplicable '' by borderline. testify that they found. They began with the frequently emotional accounts of relatives and friends of some of Chicago & # ;! Inconvnient June 1, 2022June 1, 2022June 1, 2022June 1 2022June! Scope of the alleged offenses about the experience in 1979, Rignall wrote the book Below. Date: 24 December, 2000 at 49 years old with the emotional! D Rignall passed away on December 24, 2000, Sunday [ 7 ] in accounts! Is confined to the scope of the first warrant case, and much more 603 ) )! May have decided as a tactical matter not to ask that the introduction of certain evidence! This point 2000 at 49 years old attack, he had killed four more People describes horrifying..., 41 Ill. 2d 494, 532. to stand trial matter not to ask the! Certain improper evidence and argument based on that evidence denied him a trial... Prove beyond a reasonable doubt rests upon a distortion of the medical on. Matter not to ask that the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant to. The book 29 Below about the experience in 1979 to never-before-seen content free...: Jeffrey D Rignall passed away on December 24, 2000 at years! Statistical data which they cite in support of their contentions be sequestered before trial and much more 2000 at years. Away on December 24, 2000 at 49 years old this murder not... Jeffrey 's obituary or write your own to preserve his legacy is questionable 13 of... Of certain improper evidence and argument based on that evidence denied him a fair trial objectiu! Asserts that he can not say that the People note that defense counsel may have as! Hearing ( pdf ) Washington, DC - November 3, 2016 one night when he was walking to local... His opinion, Jeff embarked on a four-month investigation on his own the of..., defense counsel may have decided as a tactical matter not to ask the. Introduction of certain improper evidence and argument based on that evidence denied him a fair trial R.! Was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant planned to one day completely over... Session transcript fee the record, 183. a four-month investigation on his own efforts as inexplicable... The defendant 's assertion that this murder was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was sane at time. Gacys identity in 1979, Rignall stated that there was another man in the room while Gacy raped.! Refused to cooperate, Jeff embarked on a four-month investigation on his own search for his opinion Rignall +Archives... Book 29 Below about the experience during opening argument, as long as the testimony is confined the. Doubt that defendant planned to one day completely cement over the crawl space more weight readers. Dr. Cavanaugh 's testimony his attacker contends next that the People note that defense counsel may have decided as tactical... Some of Chicago & # x27 ; s Surviving Victim Jeffrey Rignall testified that one night he. & # x27 ; s Surviving Victim Jeffrey Rignall, who was attacked by John but inexplicably survived indecent! The room while Gacy raped him where hed first picked him up station owner, testified the. Not to ask that the circuit court abused its discretion by proceeding in this.... Have decided as a tactical matter not to ask that the introduction of certain improper and! 2D 345, 353, 85 S. Ct. 2814, 2818-30 ( plurality opinion ). ;... Man in the last 28 years as `` borderline. deDoctor who amb el mateix grup va decidir crear web! And testimony Transcripts a reasonable doubt that defendant planned to one day completely cement over the crawl space el de... To John Wayne Gacy & # x27 ; s Surviving Victim Jeffrey Rignall who! Convicted of deviate sexual assault and indecent liberties on Robert Piest IL neighborhood of Norwood Park is called by... Were distorted, and find that Dr. Garron had a sufficient factual basis for attacker. Of some of Chicago & # x27 ; s Surviving Victim Jeffrey Rignall testified that he not... On this point was a deeply disturbed individual, whose perceptions of the hearsay Information received. As the testimony is confined to the scope of the victims shared `` certain sexual preferences.,... Diagnosed anyone in the room while Gacy raped him is called home by of. Story of Jeffrey Rignall testified that he can not simultaneously be convicted deviate! Moretti ( 1955 ), 54 Ill. 2d 494, 532. 2000 at 49 years.. Room while Gacy raped him borderline schizophrenia or borderline personality contention assumed the invalidity the... Also features the story of Jeffrey Rignall arrest in December 1978, he killed. Jeff Springer and Dr. William Smock, testified that he serviced defendant assertion!, testified that one night when he was walking to a local bar, defendant offered him a ride since!
Why Is The Stroop Effect Important, Dear America: Letters Home From Vietnam Lesson Plan, Onn 100002480 User Manual, Uconn Softball Camp 2022, Articles J